Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


Defining the majors that comprise ‘‘STEM’’: an analytical method for looking beyond the classical acronym

  • Autores: Gillian M. Nicholls, Harvey Wolfe, Mary Besterfield Sacre, Larry J. Shuman
  • Localización: The International journal of engineering education, ISSN-e 0949-149X, Vol. 30, no. Extra 2, 2014, págs. 360-377
  • Idioma: inglés
  • Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
  • Resumen
    • There is no universally agreed-upon definition for ‘‘STEM.’’ Research in STEM education would be aided by developing aconvention for how to categorize students’ potential college majors. This study develops and tests a definition of STEM and amethod for verifying the definition’s validity and usefulness. A classification scheme is developed from reviewing prior educationalresearch; examining the National Science Foundation’s categorizing of fields of study; and constructing a predictive model.Demographic, attitudinal, experiential, and standardized test score variables from the National Educational Longitudinal Study of1988 (NELS:88) dataset are used to predict which students will earn a STEM degree vs. another educational outcome. Thepredictive model tests the classification of majors into different four year degree outcomes. It tests the inclusion of majors beyondthe classic ‘‘bench’’ sciences, engineering, and mathematics. Models were fitted to predict whether students had a STEM vs. otheroutcome, and the predicted outcomes were compared to actual outcomes. The models with more divergent outcomes had greateraccuracy. Students earning a degree involving significant quantitative coursework in a field not generally considered STEM hadmore factors in common with students earning a Non-STEM degree. A narrow definition of STEM focusing on the bench sciences,engineering, and mathematics produces more accurate predictions. This method for classifying educational outcomes allowsresearchers to precisely define which majors or non-degree outcomes are included in the analysis. The method is flexible enough toaccommodate a mutually exclusive and exhaustive set of outcomes.


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno