This volume focuses on the relationship and interaction of language and science between 1700 and 1900. It pays particular attention to English History writing in late Modern English as compiled in the Corpus of History English Texts (CHET), a newly released sub-corpus of the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. The chapters cover methodological issues, the period and the status of the discipline itself, as well as pilot studies for the description of scientific discourse using CHET. They embrace topics in several linguistic fields: discourse analysis, syntax, semantics, morpho-syntax. The studies take into account extralinguistic parameters of texts, such as year of publication, sex of the author, geographical provenance of authors and the communicative formats/genres to which the text sample belongs. In the particular case of CHET, the collected samples can be grouped in eight different categories and such categories, as well as the above-mentioned metadata information, can be used to search the corpus. The book is of interest for scholars specialised in corpus linguistics and historical linguistics, as well as linguists in general. The metadata information used for analysis can also be of interest for historians and historians of science in particular.The Corpus of History English Texts (CHET), accompanied by the Coruña Corpus Tool (CCT), purpose-designed software by IrLab, is accessible online at the Repositorio Universidade Coruña at http://hdl.handle.net/2183/21849
Writing History in Late Modern English: Explorations of the Coruña Corpus: a preface
págs. 1-3
págs. 5-20
"There were always Indians passing to and fro": Notes on the representation of Native Americans in CHET documents
págs. 21-39
págs. 41-56
Typical linguistic patterns of English History texts from the eighteenth to the nineteenth century: An information-theoretic approach
págs. 57-81
págs. 83-101
Time and history: A preliminary approach to binomials in late Modern English Astronomy and History texts
págs. 103-127
"Were this eftimation, however, to be depended on": Inversion conditionals as evidence of paradigmatic change in CHET
págs. 129-147
págs. 149-165
págs. 167-183
How intimate was the tone of female History writing in the Modern period?: Evidence from the Corpus of History English Texts
págs. 185-213
Neither I nor we: Inexplicit authorial voice in eighteenth century academic texts
págs. 215-234
Do writers express the same attitude in historical genres?: A contrastive analysis of attitude devices in the Corpus of History English Texts
págs. 235-257
On cognitive complexity in scientific discourse: A corpus based study on additive coherence relations
págs. 259-276
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados