Generoak harreman zaila izan du errefuxiatuen nazioarteko zuzenbidearekin. Izan ere, 1951ko Genevako Konbentzioak eta 1967ko New Yorkeko Protokoloak jaso ez zuten jazarpenerako arrazoi hori bestelako arauen bidez interpretatu behar izan da nazioarte mailan, eskualdeetan eta estatuetan. Horrez gain, generoa gizarte talde jakinarekin lotu ohi da, nazioarteko legedian gutxien zehaztutako jazarpen arrazoiarekin, eta arrazoi horren definizio faltak ere zailtasunak eragiten ditu generoagatik jazarritako pertsonen nazioarteko babesa bermatzerakoan. Gainera, zaildu egiten du generoa errefuxiatuen hitzarmeneko gainerako zioekin lotzea eta genero ikuspegia errefuxiatuen zuzenbide sistema osora zabaltzea, eta horrek emakumeei oztopoak jartzen dizkie euren nazioarteko babes eskaeretan.
Gender has a conflictive relationship with the International Refugee Law system. The 1951 Geneva Convention and the 1967 New York Protocol have not considered gender as a motive of persecution to grant asylum, so its interpretation has been introduced through additional legal instruments in the international, regional and national frameworks. Moreover, gender has always been linked to the particular social group ground, which is the least defined reason of persecution. The lack of concretion of the concept has rendered more difficult the correct evaluation of gender-based asylum petitions. In addition to that, gender has only been subtly linked to the rest of the motives of the Convention, and the inclusion of gender perspective in the whole International Refugee Law system has been arduous, which provides further difficulties for women in their asylum petitions.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados