Resumen de Boghossian’s Argument from Inference and Identity Belief Ascriptions
Boghossian proposed an argument against mental externalism, which claims that if externalism were true our de dicto ascriptions could not offer the rational explanations we expect from them. Here I present and defend an answer to this argument. I claim that the externalist can indeed offer good explanations if she makes use of identity belief ascriptions. In order to defend such a proposal from some possible problems, I superficially characterize a model about what it is to engage in an inference and what it is to offer a rational explanation.
