Listening and the League of Nations: Acoustics Are the Argument

• Sabine von Fischer ^[1]
  1. [1] École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Suiza
• Localización: Le Corbusier: 50 años después / Jorge Torres Cueco (aut.), 2016, ISBN 978-84-9048-373-2, págs. 694-712
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • In the debates following the 1926-27 competition for the new headquarters of the League of Nations in Geneva, theacoustic aspect was largely overlooked. The competition coincided with the formation of architectural acoustics as aprofession and an academic discipline. Looking at this coincidence sheds new light on the reasoning of Peter Meyer andSigfried Giedion, who, in support of Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret’s scheme, gave remarkable prominence to argumentsabout acoustics. The transmission of speech in the large Assembly Hall with seating for 2,700 could not be resolved bytraditional techniques, and opinions on the modern method of electroacoustic amplification differed greatly. The protagonistswho stepped forward in favor of Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret’s scheme, for which Gustave Lyon served as acousticadvisor, emphasized the sound quality of their design for the large Assembly Hall. Despite the acoustically infeasiblecompetition brief, they declared literal understanding, based on the intelligibility of speech, to be a fundamental function ofthe League of Nations headquarters.The questions raised in this paper relate to architecture’s aurality and visuality, as well as claims concerning function indebates on Modernism. Diplomatic understanding was evidently at stake in the League of Nations’ political program, but,curiously, literal understanding was neglected in the acoustic design for the Assembly Hall by many of the competitors andthe jury, and - apart from a short remark by Jacques Gubler in 1985 - was subsequently overlooked by historians.