Inclusión de un prebiótico (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) y un probiótico (Pediococcus acidilactici) en dietas para lechones destetados precozmente. Efecto zootécnico

Eduardo de Mercado de la Peña; C. Tomás; Emilio Gómez Izquierdo; José Gómez Fernández

Ayuda

Inclusión de un prebiótico (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) y un probiótico (Pediococcus acidilactici) en dietas para lechones destetados precozmente. Efecto zootécnico

E. De Mercado ^[1] ; C. Tomás ^[2] ; E. Gomez Izquierdo ^[1] ; J. Gomez Fernandez ^[1]
1. [1] Instituto Tecnológico Agrario de Castilla y León
  
  Instituto Tecnológico Agrario de Castilla y León
  
  León, España
2. [2] CITA-IVIA
Localización: XV Jornadas sobre Producción Animal: 14 y 15 de mayo de 2013, Zaragoza / Jorge Hugo Calvo Lacosta (aut.), Isabel Casasús Pueyo (aut.), Margalida Joy Torrens (aut.), Javier Álvarez Rodríguez (aut.), Luis Varona Aguado (aut.), Begoña Panea Doblado (aut.), Carlos Calvete Margolles (aut.), Joaquín Balcells Teres (aut.), Vol. 1, 2013, ISBN 978-84-695-7684-7, págs. 168-170
Idioma: español
Títulos paralelos:
- Inclusion of a prebiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and probiotic (Pediococcus acidilactici) in early weaned piglet diets. Zootechnical performance
Enlaces
- Texto Completo Libro 1 (pdf) 2 (pdf)
Resumen
- A total of two hundred twenty-five crossbred piglets LW-Pietrain x LD-LW (barrows and gilts) with an initial BW of 8.20 ± 1.60 kg (28 ± 2 days of age), were used to investigate the effect of two additives on the productive performance. There were three dietary treatments with the same energetic and protein levels, in a complete randomized block design (two blocks of 8 and 7 pens, 15 piglets/pen): A, control; B, control with 0.1% probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici (109 CFU/kg feed); C, control with a derived of prebiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae (0.1% in feedstuff). No differences were observed by inclusion probiotic (B) or prebiotic (C) in the first test period (28-39 days of age). However, in the second phase (39 to 60 days of age), the addition of prebiotic and probiotic significantly improved ADG (354 vs 298, 297 g/d. C, B, A, respectively; P < 0.05 ) and FC (1.96 vs 2.09 vs 2.23 g/d C, B, A, respectively; P<0.05), with the same ADFI (P > 0.05). In overall experimental period (28-60 days of age) use of prebiotics improved ADG (353 vs 319, 310 g/d C, B, A; P<0.05), and the use of both additives significantly improved FC (P < 0.05). We conclude that it should further investigate the patterns of use of probiotics and prebiotics to optimize their use in commercial production conditions.