Fraktur or Antiqua in primary schools?: the struggle for a unified typeface in German-speaking Switzerland between the mid-nineteenth and early twentieth

• Lukas Boser ^[1] ; Michèle Hofmann ^[2]
  1. [1] University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland

     University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland

     Windisch, Suiza

     
  2. [2] University of Zurich

     University of Zurich

     Zürich, Suiza

     
• Localización: Paedagogica Historica: International journal of the history of education, ISSN 0030-9230, Vol. 55, Nº. 6, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Education and the visual dimension of writing : script systems and typefaces in educational history), págs. 792-811
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • In this paper, we analyse the struggle for a unified style of writing in primary schools in the German-speaking part of Switzerland between the 1860s and the first decades of the twentieth century with regard to the contexts in which this struggle was embedded. In the late-nineteenth century, in German-speaking Switzerland, as in other parts of the German-speaking realm, a controversy emerged regarding whether general writing practices (handwriting and print) should adhere to the traditional Gothic script and typefaces called Fraktur or whether such practices should change in favour of the Latin script and typefaces called Antiqua. This controversy was fuelled by economic arguments (Latin script was used in international commerce), scientific arguments (the question of which typeface was “healthier” emerged), and arguments questioning which cultural liaisons should be upheld or even strengthened (Antiqua was identified with Romance and English languages and cultures, whereas Fraktur was identified with German language and culture). In German-speaking Switzerland, as a part of a multilingual country, the latter was particularly important because this question of cultural allegiance was expressed by the basic cultural practice of writing