Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


Sources of Individual Differences in Reading Comprehension and Reading Fluency.

    1. [1] University of Washington

      University of Washington

      Estados Unidos

    2. [2] Vanderbilt University

      Vanderbilt University

      Estados Unidos

    3. [3] Leiden University

      Leiden University

      Países Bajos

    4. [4] University of Minnesota

      University of Minnesota

      City of Minneapolis, Estados Unidos

  • Localización: Journal of educational psychology, ISSN-e 1939-2176, ISSN 0022-0663, Vol. 95, Nº. 4, 2003, págs. 719-729
  • Idioma: inglés
  • Enlaces
  • Resumen
    • This study examined the common and distinct contributions of context-free and context reading skill to reading comprehension and the contributions of context-free reading skill and reading comprehension to context fluency. The 113 4th-grade participants were measured in reading comprehension, read aloud a folktale, and read aloud the folktale's words in a random list. Fluency was scaled as speed (words read correctly in 1 min) and time (seconds per correct word). Relative to list fluency, context fluency was a stronger predictor of comprehension. List fluency and comprehension each uniquely predicted context fluency, but their relative contributions depended on how fluency was scaled (time or speed). Results support the conclusion that word level processes contribute relatively more to fluency at lower levels while comprehension contributes relatively more at higher levels. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno