Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


Resumen de First-year engineering students’ perceptions of engineering disciplines: a qualitative investigation

Rachel L. Kajfez, Krista M. Kecskemety, Emily S. Miller, Kathryn Gustafson, Kerry L. Meyers, Gregory W. Bucks, Katherine Tanner

  • In understanding undergraduate students’success in college, their choice of career path must be fully understood. Differentpaths are appropriate for different students, and even a student may not fully grasp what will work best for them.Understanding the mechanisms behind a successful choice in college major is important for several reasons. Retention isnecessary for the continued health of engineering programs. One of the earliest steps in this career path is selecting a major.Research has been done investigating major selection across all majors, and even focusing on STEM careers. This researchhas frequently overlooked the broad variety present in engineering majors with very limited research conducted thatdistinguishes between one engineering major and another. This paper seeks to address this absence by surveyingengineering students from several different majors at three different institutions. The data for this paper was gatheredusing surveys of first year engineers at three dissimilar institutions. The survey data examined were open-responsequestions. These questions asked students to describe how they viewed specific engineering career paths. It is the goal ofanalyzing these responses to gain better insight into the student perception of various engineering majors. The data wascoded through an inductive coding process. This coding process resulted in nine unique codes. The codes were analyzed toallow broader trends to surface. The results of this analysis have shown that not only do students in different engineeringmajors view these disciplines differently, but also that students at these different institutions view engineering differently.


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus