Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


Comparing two types of diagnostic items to evaluate understanding of heat and temperature concepts

  • Autores: Hye-Eun Chu, A. L. Chandrasegaran, David F. Treagust
  • Localización: School Science Review, ISSN 0036-6811, Vol. 99, Nº. 368, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Epistemic insight III), págs. 107-117
  • Idioma: inglés
  • Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
  • Resumen
    • The purpose of this research was to investigate an efficient method to assess year 8 (age 13–14) students’ conceptual understanding of heat and temperature concepts. Two different types of instruments were used in this study: Type 1, consisting of multiple-choice items with open-ended justifications; and Type 2, consisting of two-tier multiple-choice items. Each of the instruments was administered to two separate cohorts of 173 and 143 year 8 students of similar achievement. The findings indicated that the students were better able to show their understanding in the two-tier multiple-choice items. Hence, based on this investigation, two-tier multiple-choice items may be more suitable for evaluating year 8 students’ understanding of science concepts.


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno