Climber Ability and Differences in Psychological, Physiological and Behavioral Responses to an On-sight Lead Climb

• Giles, David ^[2] ; Mangan, Kevin ^[1] ; Draper, Nick ^[1]
  1. [1] University of Canterbury

     University of Canterbury

     Nueva Zelanda

     
  2. [2] Lattice Training Ltd., United Kingdom
• Localización: The Spanish Journal of Psychology, ISSN 1138-7416, Nº 29, 2026
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Rock climbing performance is affected by psychophysiological stress that can vary based on route difficulty relative to the climber’s ability. The purpose of this study was to investigate psychophysiological, emotional, and performance differences between climbers attempting a lead route above (CLLabove), at (CLL) or below (CLLbelow) their on-sight ability level. 61 intermediate to advanced climbers completed a single on-sight lead ascent. Measurements of climbing performance (technique, tactics, etc.), psychophysiological (heart rate, cardiovascular reactivity, cortisol, etc) and psychometric variables (somatic and cognitive anxiety, self-confidence) were taken before and after receiving the task instructions; and pre, during and post climb. The main findings of this study were: a) significant improvements in climbing performance with increased ability relative to the route (geometric entropy: p = .013); b) greater intensity of somatic (p < .005) and cognitive anxiety (p = .005) and lower self-confidence (p < .005) between CLLabove and CLL and CLLbelow; c) a significant difference in anticipatory HR between CLLabove and CLLbelow (p = .002), but no significant differences in salivary cortisol. Results suggested that increased difficulty relative to a climber’s ability, yielding an increased likelihood of a climber falling or being unable to complete the route, was likely to elicit a negative emotional response, increase anxiety, decrease self-confidence and disrupt performance.