The mesoderm is the third germ layer, which is formed at gastrulation between the endoderm and the ectoderm in triploblastsc animals (Bilateria). The mesoderm differentiates into muscles, connective tissues and coelomic cavities. These structures have been key evolutionary innovations that prompted the enormous radiation of the bilaterians that at present make up for the 90% of animal species. As such, understanding the evolution of the mesoderm and its derivatives it is pivotal to understand the evolution of animals. In this thesis I have characterized the molecular patterning of the mesoderm and its derivatives (mainly muscles) in two different acoel species: Symsagittifera roscoffensis and Isodiametra pulchra. The acoels belong to the phylum Acoelomorpha (togheter with nemertodermatids and Xenoturbella). The phylogenetic placement of the Acoelomorpha is highly debated between a position basal to the bilaterians or nested inside the deuterostomes. The Acoelomorpha are morphologically simple animals and a trait sometimes considered a direct link to the cnidarians, the Bilateria sister group. With them they the acoelomorphs share a blind gut and a non centralized nervous system. Within the acoelomorphs, the acoels present the most derived body plan, however it is still rather simple if compared to other bilaterians. The nervous system for example is condensed anteriorly but not clear dorso ventral centralization exists as in most of the remaining bilaterians (the nerve cords are distributed circumferentially around the body). The mesoderm only develops from endodermal precursors, and this might be ancestral, since it is thought that the mesoderm evolved from the endoderm of a diploblastic, cnidarian-like ancestor. The muscles are the only mesodermal derivative in most basal acoelomorphs taxa, although in more advanced ones a parenchymal tissue, stem cells, and gonads also occupy the mesodermal space. The embryonic origins of the latter though, are at present still unknown. Thus acoelomorphs present most of traits considered to be eumetazoan ancestral traits (i.e. most of traits are also part of the cnidarians ground pattern), but still that the possibility that their body plan evolved in consequence of a secondary reduction must be considered as they could be more related to other deuterostomes than cnidarians. I have first investigated the molecular architecture of the muscles in the acoel Symsagittifera roscoffensis and found that although they have a smooth ultrastructural aspect they are molecularly more similar to the bilaterian striated muscles given that tey express key genes that control the contraction in the striated cells. This could be considered a first step into the evolution of the striated musculature without fully reaching it. Indeed, cnidarians have smooth epithelio muscular cells likely regulated by the same bilaterian smooth muscle proteins. However, the possibility of a secondary loss of the striation pattern cannot be discarded given that this already happened in some other bilaterians. Second, I have analyzed the expression of bilaterian mesodermal genes during embryogenesis and postembryonic development of Isodiametra pulchra and found that all but one (a FoxA ortholog) are expressed at the anterior pole, the site where the first myocytes start to differentiate. In juveniles and adults these genes are all expressed in muscles or at least a subset of them. Moreover the same genes are expressed in the gonads of I. pulchra and therefore it suggests that they could orginate in the endo-mesoderm of the worm. The cnidarians orthologues of these genes are expressed in the endoderm, which is moreover the site of the gametes differentation. The similarity between cnidarians endoderm and acoels mesoderm are astonishing, however before drawing conclusions we need a solid phylogenetic frame.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados