El servicio público ferroviario de carga en México: una valoración interdisciplinaria desde el Derecho Administrativo a 20 años de ser "actividad prioritaria" del desarrollo de la Administración Pública Federal

• Autores: Jaime de Jesús Paredes Camacho
• Directores de la Tesis: Guadalupe Fernández Ruiz (dir. tes.)
• Lectura: En la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México ( México ) en 2018
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Tesis en acceso abierto en: ru.dgb.unam.mx
• Resumen

  • CHAPTER ONE: It shows four historic references to the Mexican Railway System development as follows: 1st.1824-1880 "the first 11,000 Km; 2nd.1880-1910 ongoing process 9,000 Km"; 3rd. "1910- 1995" The "Ferrocarriles Nacionales de Mexico". 4th. 1996-2016 the concession years managed and invested by international industry; main issues.

    CHAPTER TWO: This is the first of two parts about legal concepts referred not only administrative law based on public functions: executive, legislation and judicial; but also administrative elements to its performance: Government Office, Council of State and Ministers of State. It contains perform public administration organization ways as centralized, decentralized and desincorporated to pursue public goals. One of those is the Minister of Communications and Transportation that includes: The Regulatory Railroad Transportation Agency. It also develops public service as a concept and its elements as a rate and a contract in the concession. Define too the Mexico's government meaning about strategic and priority activities.

    CHAPTER THREE: This is the second part about legal concepts. It is not just focused in different kind of concessions, but also rights and duties to authority, concessionaires and users; ways to extinction, law reversion, performance under public collaboration. Users defense about public administration. It also includes historic reference about Mexican Constitution Article 28 were concession was based onto the last Mexico's Railway concession 1995.

    CHAPTER FOUR: This chapter talks about comparative law referred to European and North American railway operation and legislation processes.

    PROPOUSALS: It not only mentions one proposal to each concession's side as follows: to authority, to concessionaires, to users, to academic view, but also eight suggestions to the get a better concession's performance onto current and future railway public service.

    CONCLUSIONS: Based on released hypothesis and chapters developed, conclusions are links between history references, legal concepts, and comparative law from other ways to do railway maters, proposals are focused to get the best concession opportunities from now on.