La incidencia de las técnicas de reproducción humana asistida en la filiación

• Autores: Verónica Marisol Ramos Velásquez
• Directores de la Tesis: Miguel Arcángel Arana Cortez (dir. tes.)
• Lectura: En la Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo ( Perú ) en 2015
• Idioma: español
• Número de páginas: 226
• Enlaces
  • Tesis en acceso abierto en: repositorio.unprg.edu.pe
• Resumen
  • español

    El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo reflexionar sobre las Tecnicas de Reproducción Humana Asistida entre la mas importante fecundación "in vitro" tema de gran actualidad nacional e interés público por su estrecha conexión con uno de los valores fundamentales de nuestra realidad: el respeto y consideración a la vida, referente fundamental de todos los derechos y libertades humanas que es protegido por nuestra Constitucion y por los Instrumentos Internacionales. Sabemos que las ciencias médicas se han propuesto curar la enfermedad y preservar la vida en una medida jamás soñada.

    En épocas anteriores, prueba de ello, son los avances recientes en el estudio del genoma humano y sus posibilidades casi ilimitadas en áreas como: la ingeniería genética, la inseminación artificial, la fecundación "in vitro': los transplantes de órganos y otras técnicas. Sin embargo ante los adelantos de la ciencia, se vulnera los derechos fundamentales de la persona, en especial la vida, manipulando el genoma humano, realizando experimentos con los embriones que ocasionan la muerte de miles de ellos, ocasionando daños irreversibles al futuro biológico, en virtud del cual estas técnicas de reproducción asistida no deben permitirse por considerarlas inconstitucionales. En el Primer capitulo, se examina la Filiacion, los derechos de la persona como bien jurídico tutelado por la Constitucion, que son vulnerados por la técnica de Inseminacion Artificial y la Fecundacion in Vitro, (Tecnicas de Reproduccion Humana Asistida) al hablar sobre el inicio de la vida que se realiza con la concepción; y a la vez le faculta al marido a interponer las acciones correspondientes en base al Principio "Pateris is quem nuptiae demostran" y en el caso de que no hubo consentimiento del marido y la conyuge se insemino, si el conyuge no interpone la acción correspondiente dentro del plazo legal, de acuerdo al art. 361 el asume la paternidad del niño de su conyuge producto de una inseminación. Consecuentemente si el marido no se considera padre del hijo de su conyuge puede interponer la impugnación de paternidad. Con respecto a los derechos reproductivos, la persona es libre de decidir; pero esta libertad no le da ningún derecho de atentar contra los derechos fundamentales del ser que se esta formando. Por este motivo no debemos permitir que se sigan realizando estas técnicas de reproducción que atentan contra nuestros derechos fundamentales, a la vez que justificándose las mujeres en el derecho a procrear, conciban mediante estas técnicas seres humanos sin padre, es decir estamos creando relaciones monoparentales. Se estaría rompiendo el esquema reproductivo de la filiación y se vulneraria el Principio del Interes Superior Del Niño. ( art IX del T.P del Codigo del Niño y del Adolescente).

  • English

    The affiliation is an institution of family law consisting of the existing parent-child relationship between a person with the father who begot and the mother who gave birth.

    We must remember that not always that bond beco mes sexualunion, as it m ay come from a Technique Assisted Human Reproducti01i, where sexual1ntercourse disappears. The ftliation by blood is based on a biological fact, when through sexual intercourse, by the couple, the woman is fertilized by the maJe and ultimately enlightening. So we determine paternity ís based bíological father's relationshíp with respect to the child, ie patemity who has provided the semen is attributed. lt is important for the determination of ftliation and exercise of the relevant shares, the decision that the child was bom and this decision must come from the consensual agreement of couples.

    Fertilization was executed without the consent of the husband is entitled to contest paternity, as it not only lacked the biological budget but also volitional, ie the decision of procreational act for that to be born; lt is a relevant cause, sin ce without that decision the child does not exist. Now there is the possibility of adding to these procreative acts to others, individuals without legal position {afft/iation, rights and obligations) was · · prescribed by ley.Es doubt that the application of these techniques Assisted Human Reproduction, is indispensable the husband's consent to become legal father of the chi/d that illuminates hís wife. Various methods are used for this purpose, possessing each legal consequences ofwhich may ata certain moment, hands reaching Applicator law. The Civil Code, particularly the Family Book, for example do not establish any rules related to assumptions regarding these Assisted Reproduction Technique linked to the establishment of filiation.

    which exists in the country one vacuum state of anomie or why reproductive breaks-law scheme. However already been tal k of a Genetic Law at the Nationci.l Doctrine and has been developing a vast legal literature, subtracting only legal development to protect the bioscience advances in science Genética.Las Assisted Human Reproduction Techniques with respect to the General Health Law No. 26842, resorting to infertility treatment, it would be colliding Children 's Right, beca use there is a clash of ideas or principies where raw BEST INTERESToF THE CHILD {Art. IX ofTP Code ofChild and Adolescent) relative to the procreation and Biologicalldentity of the Child, the product of artificial insemination.

    Not only because Procreation is not the result of natural method, but because the child would have different genetic material of one spouse, in the case of Artificial lnsemination Heterologou~ being the most affected in the area of family law parent-child relationships. It is stated in the Doctrine that sin ce there is a multiplicity of genetic materials that exist reproductive elements of a third party to the marriage relationship, determines that the filial relationship would be affected, unstabilized_ for the son to be born would have a legal father anda genetic father. Thus the term Artificiallnsemination alluded, not only beca use the means employed to achieve the encounter of gametes is atypical, but also because it ends in the single implantation genetic component. a/Iowing ferti/ization to occur randomly. Furthermore it should be noted that the absence of copulatory act represents a constant of this technique of reproduction. However it can not be described a._s asexual, since attends the un ion of two ce/ls come from different beings, but of the same species generating a new individual. Problems such as Artificial Insemination, is adjacent to progress in the biological scientific terms or proper means, a deftnite ethical, social and legal referral, the issue reached a momentous impact in terms of its possible legitimacy. · What does not ftt is to persevere in the existing legal consideration. What do es not ftt is to persevere in the current lack of legal status to such scientific advances, because such an attitude would be to leave them in the hands of possible unscrupulous opportunists and perhaps other party to the right, knew not living up to his time .Current Trend adopts a permissive position, admitting the practice of artificial insemination of couples without marriage and the intervention of the donor of the semen used, prohibiting only lnsemination Post Mortem. Beca use it is leaving asid e the Social Function of fa mi/y law and the valuation of marriage as the institution that legal/y guarantees the rights of chíldren is imperative el dictado of separate laws on the subject to ensure both "The protection of human life" from early stages of development. as well as the institution of family, whose stability could be af!ected by the application of these techniques in different variants lt is to be noted that being the Assisted Human Reproduction Techniques supplemental infertility processes should require the General Act Saludn!! 26842 art. 7 show the depletion of these treatments in order to consolidate the means and ends of Assisted Procreation. The Peruvian legal system on Assisted Reproduction only has Artic/e 7 of the General Health Law. n o 26842 prescribing Everyone has the right to appeal to their infertility treatment and to procreate using assisted reproductive techniques_ provided the conditionof genetic mother falls on the same person. For the application of Assisted Reproduction Techniques, . prior. consent is required in writing from the biological. parents.- The situation becomes .. . · more confusing when the debate on the Rights drift futuristic issues such as the Gene Technology. which is why individuals have a right to freedom ofProcreation. That includes both the right to procreate, as the right not to procreate [which therefore inc/udes the right to abortion] limited not only to procreation by coi tal means_ if not also applied to procreation by noncoital media such as fertilization in vitro. Genetic inheritance is important in shaping the persona/ity. and this exceeds .the legal relationship of ftliation, affecting their dignity and the right to privacy as a person.

    Everyone has ultiinately Rights released its origin, however, and to the extent that nothing affects the personality of the donor or his physical or mental development. the donor has right to know the identity of her son. Should apply the Principie of Biological Truth in certain cases even to establish patemity in protection hijo.Es also necessary to clarif.y that is not the same normative regulation ofmedia, that the legislation regulating the effects of such techniques in Peru there are no regulations regarding Tecnicas, even though their practice develops, and within the country.