Modality in english counterterrorism documents (unsc counterterrorism resolutions)
- Autores: Anush Martirosyan
- Directores de la Tesis: Jesús Varela Zapata (dir. tes.)
- Lectura: En la Universidade de Santiago de Compostela ( España ) en 2024
- Idioma: inglés
- Tribunal Calificador de la Tesis: María Socorro Suárez Lafuente (presid.), JoDee Anderson (secret.), José Manuel Estévez-Saá (voc.)
- Programa de doctorado: Programa de Doctorado en Estudios Culturales: Memoria, Identidad, Territorio y Lenguaje por la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela y Université de Haute-Bretagne (Rennes II)(Francia)
- Calificación: Sobresaliente Cum Laude
- Materias:
- Enlaces
- Tesis en acceso abierto en: MINERVA
- Resumen
KEYWORDS: modality, terrorism, counterterrorism, modal verbs, diplomatic speech This dissertation addresses the modality approaches of various linguists, such as Palmer, Bally, Plungian, Lyons, Vinogradov, Van der Auwera, Narrog, etc., with the aim of identifying gaps in the study of modality and providing a more comprehensive approach to modality based on analysis.
The first chapter of the doctoral thesis distinguishes between objective and subjective modality, underscoring that modality encompasses both the reflection of factual reality (objective modality) and the speaker's subjective attitudes (subjective modality). Various interpretations of modality types are explored, including deontic (relating to obligation and permission), epistemic (relating to knowledge and belief), dynamic (relating to ability), and their respective nuances. Furthermore, it discusses how different linguists define modality both as a syntactic and semantic category, highlighting the ongoing debate surrounding the classification and definition of modality.
The second chapter outlines the historical evolution of terrorism, from its ancient roots to its contemporary understanding in linguistics and policymaking. It touches upon the challenges of defining terrorism and the complexities that arise in establishing a universal definition. The political use of the term further complicates global counterterrorism efforts, as it becomes a tool for justifying actions taken by both state and non-state actors.
The third chapter explores the linguistic framework and functions of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) counterterrorism resolutions, specifically focusing on resolutions enacted following the events of 9/11. Our analysis examines 52 counterterrorism resolutions initiated from 2001 onward. The chapter delves into the concept of modality, examining how verb choice influences the tone and levels of obligation within the resolutions. It categorizes verb usage into obligations (must, shall), recommendations (should, encourages), urgency (immediately, urgently), cooperation, and commitment. Different semantic forms are analyzed, such as modal nouns, adjectives, adverbs, and present participles, to illustrate how they express necessity, obligation, and the urgency of actions required by member states. Based on the given analysis, we provided conclusions with some recommendations that might help in better combating terrorism.
