Interpreting National Trajectories with Gellner, Anderson and Smith:: The Case of Quebec

• Félix Mathieu ^[1] ; Marc André Bodet ^[2]
  1. [1] University of Quebec at Montreal

     University of Quebec at Montreal

     Canadá

     
  2. [2] Laval University

     Laval University

     Canadá

     
• Localización: Revista d'estudis autonòmics i federals, ISSN 1886-2632, Nº. 29, 2019, págs. 17-50
• Idioma: catalán
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • Ernest Gellner, Benedict Anderson and Anthony Smith have had a significant influence in debates and theoretical discussions concerning the understanding of nations and nationalism. However, one should not accept such classic theories ipso facto without questioning their theoretical assumptions. Hence, we find that one way to better understand the way these theories are still relevant (or not) for the understanding of nations and nationalism is to confront their explanatory potential with a specific case. This is precisely the main objective, and therefore contribution, of this paper. We thus focus on a “problematic” or “abnormal” case relative to a more general understanding of what a nation and nationalism ought to be. We look at the Canadian province of Quebec, a minority nation that possesses its own independent institutional and societal culture, while evolving within a more encompassing sovereign state — the Canadian federation. Our goal is less to provide an exhaustive account of socio-historical settings than to use Gellner, Anderson and Smith’s theories to provide a fair interpretation of the way Quebec has evolved as a minority nation within the Canadian federation. To our knowledge, no other study has applied a similar framework — these theories of nationalism and their testing — to the Quebec case.