Información General

• Autores: Frans H. van Eemeren (ed. lit.), Bart Garssen (ed. lit.)
• Editores: Springer Suiza
• Año de publicación: 2020
• País: Suiza
• Idioma: inglés
• ISBN: 978-3-030-28369-8, 978-3-030-28366-7
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)

Resumen

• This volume comprises a selection of contributions to the theorizing about argumentation that have been presented at the 9th conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA), held in Amsterdam in July 2018.

  The chapters included provide a general theoretical perspective on central topics in argumentation theory, such as argument schemes and the fallacies. Some contributions concentrate on the treatment of the concept of conductive argument. Other contributions are dedicated to specific issues such as the justification of questions, the occurrence of mining relations, the role of exclamatives, argumentative abduction, eudaimonistic argumentation and a typology of logical ways to counter an argument. In a number of cases the theoretical problems addressed are related to a specific type of context, such as the burden of proof in philosophical argumentation, the charge of committing a genetic fallacy in strategic manoeuvring in philosophy, the necessity of community argument, and connection adequacy for arguments with institutional warrants.

  The volume offers a great deal of diversity in its breadth of coverage of argumentation theory and wide geographic representation from North and South America to Europe and China.

Otros catálogos

• Red de Bibliotecas Universitarias (REBIUN)

Listado de artículos

• • A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory

    Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen

    págs. 1-10

    

  • Argument Schemes: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Approach

    Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen

    págs. 11-24

    

  • In Search of a Workable Auxiliary Condition for AuthorityArguments

    Hans V. Hansen

    págs. 25-40

    

  • Give the Standard Treatment of Fallacies a Chance! Cognitiveand Rhetorical Insights into Fallacy Processing

    Steve Oswald, Thierry Herman

    págs. 41-62

    

  • Argument Evaluation in Philosophy: Fallacies as Strategic Maneuvering

    Federico E. López

    págs. 63-78

    

  • Dialogical Sequences, Argumentative Moves and InterrogativeBurden of Proof in Philosophical Argumentation

    Joaquin Galindo

    págs. 79-96

    

  • Eudaimonistic Argumentation

    Andrew Aberdein

    págs. 97-106

    

  • Worries About the Prospects for Community Argument

    Dale Hample

    págs. 107-130

    

  • Assessing Connection Adequacy for Argumentswith Institutional Warrants

    James B. Freeman

    págs. 131-148

    

  • On the Logical Ways to Counter an Argument: A Typology and Some Theoretical Consequences

    Huberto Marraud

    págs. 149-166

    

  • Arguing for Questions

    A. David Hitchcock

    págs. 167-184

    

  • Expressives in Argumentation: The Case of Apprehensive Straks (‘Shortly’) in Dutch

    Ronny Boogaart

    págs. 185-204

    

  • Argumentative Abduction in the Interpretation Process: A Pragma-Dialectical Study of an Ironic Utterance

    Antonio Duarte Calvo

    págs. 205-222

    

  • Is “Conductive Argument” a Single Argument?

    Isabela Fairclough

    págs. 223-238

    

  • On the Logical Reconstruction of Conductive Arguments

    Yun Xie

    págs. 239-254

    

  • The Legitimacy of Conductive Arguments: What Are the Logical Roles of Negative Considerations?

    Yanlin Liao

    págs. 255-268

    

  • Deploying Machine Learning Classifiers for ArgumentativeRelations “in the Wild”

    Oana Cocarascu, Francesca Toni

    págs. 269-286