The volume is divided into five sections. In the first chapter entitled aTheory of argumentationo, contributors debate the idea of a rational modification of beliefs as the basis of rational consensus, the G nther-Alexy debate, Opocher's conception of justice which is taken from a descriptive level to an argumentative one, truth in the field of rhetoric and judicial argumentation as well as sincerity as a necessary condition for effectiveness in legal argumentation. Further sections deal with oAnalysis and representation of argumentso, oContextualized judicial argumentso, oNorms and interpretationso and finally a section on oLogico with contributions on the stit theory and logic problems in the formalization and representation of legal knowledge in constructing an expert system.
págs. 15-24
págs. 25-32
Justice, Argumentation and Truth in Legal Reasoning: In Memory of Enrico Opocher (1914-2004)
págs. 33-39
págs. 40-47
págs. 48-56
págs. 57-67
págs. 68-74
págs. 75-94
Limiting Courts: Towards Greater Consistency of Adjudication in the Civil Law System
págs. 95-106
págs. 107-119
Prospective Overruling: Why and How it Should be Applied (The example of the Brazilian Legal System)
págs. 120-124
págs. 125-141
págs. 142-150
págs. 151-159
págs. 160-166
págs. 167-174
págs. 175-192
págs. 193-198
págs. 199-206
© 2001-2026 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados