Impossible conversations across radically different “frameworks”: A critical rationalist approach to deep disagreements
págs. 1-24
In defense of pragmatic reason: Responding to the Postmodern challenge
págs. 25-36
págs. 37-57
Argumentative style across cultures: A corpus-based comparative study of standpoint presentation by Iranian and Norwegian learners of English
págs. 58-74
págs. 75-81
The rule of law, stases, and the polarizing style: Public argument and paradiastole
págs. 82-91
págs. 92-103
págs. 104-114
págs. 115-124
Rhetorical topos analysis: Considerations for a systematic method of argumentation analysis
págs. 125-137
Caregivers’ reasoning about oncological treatment in online discussions: A comparative analysis
págs. 138-149
Explanatory dialogues and digital medicine
Petar Bodlović, Marcin Lewinski, Elena Cabrio, Serena Villata
págs. 150-162
págs. 163-177
The 2022 US National Security Strategy: Responding to new threats in an evolving world
págs. 178-186
págs. 187-195
Climate scientists as rhetorical citizens: Public argumentation in persuasive op-eds
págs. 196-204
págs. 205-217
págs. 218-226
Insinuated vs asserted ad hominem: An experimental approach to their rhetorical effectiveness on "ethos"
págs. 227-235
págs. 236-243
págs. 244-253
Scare tactics, media capture and the pandemic: Argumentative style in the online news media
págs. 254-264
págs. 265-275
págs. 276-285
Propaganda in Russian media coverage of the war in Ukraine: Emotion vs. reason
págs. 286-296
The use of diagrams in argumentation: Logical, argumentative and rhetorical approach
págs. 297-312
págs. 313-322
págs. 323-332
Argumentations in the Qur’an: A perspective of generalized argumentation theory
págs. 333-339
págs. 340-345
págs. 346-354
Argument "ad feminam": The use of gendered attacks to discredit the women participating in the 2021 hearings of the select committee to investigate the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol
págs. 355-364
págs. 365-375
How & why Toulmin Model became triangular: (Over)simplification in Japan
págs. 376-382
Strategic ambiguity vs. strategic clarity: The defense of Taiwan
págs. 383-394
Arguing on unlevelled playing fields: Local management of reasonableness in a special place for managing disagreement about health
págs. 395-408
págs. 409-419
págs. 420-435
Motivated reasoning and contradictory Internet memes: Bottomlessirony and the affective conditions of assent
págs. 436-446
págs. 447-454
Deciphering the discourse of livestreaming e-commerce in China: From the perspective of classical rhetorical persuasion
págs. 455-466
págs. 467-478
págs. 479-489
Irredentist claim-making: Legitimation warrants for possessive statism in Vladimir Putin’s war rhetoric
págs. 490-500
págs. 501-508
One-premise arguments: Jean Wagemans’ Periodic Table of Arguments, a revival of Aristotle’s "Topics"?
págs. 509-517
págs. 518-531
págs. 532-538
págs. 539-548
A construction based on audience: A rhetorical interpretation of the Toulmin model
págs. 549-560
The application of contemporary Western argumentation theories in English speech and debate in China
págs. 561-569
págs. 570-578
págs. 579-589
Epistemic and evidential expressions as context-specific argumentative indicators in institutional dialogues: A corpus study of interactions in the financial domain
págs. 590-603
págs. 604-625
págs. 626-634
págs. 635-644
“…like their comrades who fell in 1916”: Argumentative discourse in propaganda sheets from the Irish Civil War
págs. 645-654
págs. 655-664
From an extremist to status quo: Changing consciousness on climate change
págs. 665-675
págs. 676-687
págs. 688-699
págs. 700-712
An argumentative approach to representations of Fukushima: A case study of the legacy media coverage over the Russian invasion in Ukraine
págs. 713-721
págs. 722-731
págs. 732-740
Motivated criticism in indigenous consultations: Why indigenous arguments do not convince the crown
págs. 741-753
págs. 754-766
págs. 767-777
Sophocles’ "Antigone" and its argumentative value: A legal-philosophical reading
págs. 778-785
págs. 786-795
The 10.000-Argument Rule: Adequacy in theories of argument structure
págs. 796-812
págs. 813-822
How do empirical biomedical research articles argue?: Examining the layers of rhetorical, domain-specific, and citation-based argumentation
págs. 823-828
págs. 829-836
págs. 837-844
págs. 845-858
págs. 859-867
págs. 868-881
Speaking to a divided audience: The ambiguous strategic design of figured discourse
págs. 882-892
págs. 893-903
págs. 904-914
Argumentation in the intelligence domain
Jacky Visser, Dimitra Zografistou, John Lawrence, Chris Reed
págs. 915-923
págs. 924-931
págs. 932-943
págs. 944-956
págs. 957-968
Argumentation in Waltz’s “Emerging Structure of International Politics”
Magdalena Wolska, Bernd Fröhlich, Katrin Girgensohn, Sassan Gholiagha, Dora Kiesel, Jürgen Neyer, Patrick Riehmann, Mitja Sienknecht, Benno Stein
págs. 969-979
págs. 980-991
The conspiracy theory of history as argument: Vladimir Putin's September 30, 2022, and February 21, 2023, addresses or The Paranoid Style in (Putin’s) Russian Politics (with apologies to Richard Hofstadter)
págs. 992-1002
págs. 1003-1012
págs. 1013-1022
págs. 1023-1028
© 2001-2026 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados