This paper investigates the intersection of radicalism and freedom in low-tech architecture through psychological and philosophical perspectives, particularly those of Immanuel Kant. It is based on interviews with leading figures in the low-tech movement, which is typically associated with constructions using straw, unfired earth, bamboo, or other unprocessed materials, sometimes referred to as 'natural,' 'recycled,' or 'bio-based.' The study explores the motivations and paradigms among prominent architects and builders involved in this movement, who prioritise minimalism, environmental sustainability, and autonomy from conventional systems. The research highlights the emphasis low-tech practitioners place on individual empowerment, creativity, and ideological commitment, contrasting with mainstream architectural practices. The study underscores the importance of integrating psychological and philosophical dimensions into architectural research. It proposes that insights from this humanistic approach, grounded in the assertion that technological problems are often not purely technological, could bridge the gap between low-tech and mainstream construction. The paper aims to enhance understanding and integration of sustainable practices to address the climate crisis by examining the value systems, narratives, and communication strategies of low-tech proponents.
© 2001-2026 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados