Evaluation of patient-reported outcome and satisfaction following percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review

• Autores: Muhannad A Almubarak, Sultan Ayed K Alanazi, Nawaf Abdulaziz M Alzarea, Waleed Abdullah A Alzarea, Ahmed Hamoud E Alkhaldi, Salem Ibrahim S Aljaddua, Fahad Naif M Alruwaili, Sayyaf Falah S Alruwaili, Omar Mohammed A Alshaya, Sultan Farhan O Alruwaili, Norah Farhan O Aldaghmani, Yaser Abdulkareem J Aldheli
• Localización: Revista iberoamericana de psicología del ejercicio y el deporte, ISSN 1886-8576, Vol. 19, Nº. 5, 2024, págs. 524-526
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • Background: A growing number of elderly patients with satisfactory periprocedural outcomes and long-term survival are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

    Objective: To systematically review patient satisfaction after PCI.

    Methods: An extensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Science Direct was performed to locate relevant material. Rayyan QRCI was used to select the eligible articles. Results: Our data includes seven articles with 4278 children, 3378 (78.9%) of whom were males. The reported follow-up duration ranged from 3 days to 36 months. Seven studies reported a high satisfaction level following PCI. It is reported that same-day discharge corresponds with more problems. Only one study included patients who reported moderate satisfaction levels according to the SAQ-Korean version.

    Conclusion: This review found that there is a high patient-reported satisfaction among patients who underwent PCI. Larger prospective trials are needed to determine the long-term satisfaction and QOL following PCI.