Este artículo se propone abordar la memoria (los relatos, silencios, ocultamientos y reconexiones) como una herramienta teórica y metodológica habilitadora de nuevos marcos de interpretación que contribuyeron a disputar, expandir y moldear los límites y efectos previstos para la Ley 26.160 y el programa de relevamiento territorial de comunidades indígenas (ReTeCI) que esta ley ordena, con el fin de conocer la situación territorial actual de las comunidades indígenas del país. El artículo analiza el procedimiento de cumplimiento de uno de los componentes de la Carpeta Técnica (CT), focalizando en la construcción del Informe Histórico Antropológico (IHA) a fines de exponer el despliegue de múltiples efectos generados por diferentes reconexiones. Con este análisis se busca deconstruir ciertos prejuicios regionales (y nacionales) introducidos en torno a las sospechas de inautenticidad e instrumentalismo que recaen y se proyectan sobre los pueblos indígenas y sus comunidades en la actualidad; prejuicios que consideran encontrar nuevo sustento en el estallido de autoadscripciones ocurridas en el marco del relevamiento.
In the past few years the national state has deployed different actions to recognize the rights, peculiarities and claims of the original peoples, elaborating different public policies, programs and projects. Notable among them for its national scope is the sanction of Law 26.160, and its program for the territorial survey of indigenous communities (ReTeCI) that intends to understand the current territo- rial situation of indigenous communities in the country. Focusing on the context of the execution of the survey in the province of Rio Negro, this article aims to address memory (stories, silences, concealments and reconnections) as a theoretical and methodological tool to enable new frameworks of interpretation that contributed to disputing, expanding and shaping the limits and foreseen effects of this public policy. From this perspective, the article analyzes the procedure of compliance with one of the components of the Technical Fol- der (TC), focusing on the construction of the Anthropological Historical Report (IHA) in order to expose the deployment of multiple effects generated by different reconnections. The prior is in order to deconstruct certain regional (and national) prejudices introduced around the suspicions of inauthenticity and instrumentalism that fall and are projected on indigenous peoples and their communities today; prejudices that consider finding new sustenance in the explosion of auto identification occurring in the framework of the survey
© 2001-2026 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados