Perú
Objetivo: Analizar las evidencias de validez de la Escala de Florecimiento en hombres homosexuales cisgénero peruanos. Materiales y métodos: Muestra seleccionada mediante un procedimiento por bola de nieve, utilizando criterios de inclusión y exclusión. Un total de 307 adultos que cumplían con los criterios participaron en el estudio y completaron la Escala de Florecimiento. Para evaluar la estructura interna del instrumento, se llevó a cabo un análisis factorial confirmatorio (AFC). Se analizó, asimismo, la consistencia interna y la evidencia de validez en relación con otras variables. Resultados: Se demostró una estructura unidimensional y una fiabilidad aceptable. La mayoría de los índices de ajuste del modelo fueron adecuados; sin embargo, el RMSEA resultó alto. Conclusión: Se considera que el modelo propuesto puede ser utilizado ya que casi todos los índices de ajuste resultaron satisfactorios.
Objective: To analyze the evidence of validity of the Flourishing Scale in Peruvian cisgender homosexual men. Methods: Study sample selected through a snowball sampling procedure, using inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 307 adults who met the criteria participated in the study and completed the Flourishing Scale. To assess the internal structure of the scale, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted. In addition, internal consistency and evidence of validity in relation to other variables were analyzed. Results: A unidimensional structure and an acceptable reliability were demonstrated. Most of the model fit indices were adequate; however, the RMSEA was high. Conclusion: It is considered that the proposed model can be used since almost all the fit indices were satisfactory.
Objective: The aim of the study was to analyze the evidence of validity of the Flourishing Scale in Peruvian cisgender homosexual men. Method: The sample was selected by snowball sampling, using inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 307 adults who met the criteria participated in the study and completed the Flourishing Scale. To assess the internal structure of the scale, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted. In addition, internal consistency and evidence of validity in relation to other variables were analyzed. Results: The results show a unidimensional structure and acceptable reliability. The model fit indices were evaluated, and most of them showed a good fit to the observed data. However, the RMSEA was high. Conclusion: It is considered that the proposed model can be used with caution, since other fit indices indicate an adequate correspondence.
© 2001-2026 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados