In conversation with ghosts: towards a hauntological approach to decolonial design for/with AI practices

• Mugdha Patil ^[1] ; Nazli Cila ^[1] ; Johan Redström ^[3] ; Elisa Giaccardi ^[2]
  1. [1] Delft University of Technology

     Delft University of Technology

     Países Bajos

     
  2. [2] Polytechnic University of Milan

     Polytechnic University of Milan

     Milán, Italia

     
  3. [3] Umeå Institute of Design, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, ISSN 1571-0882, Vol. 20, Nº. 1, 2024, págs. 55-76
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • This is a critique of how designers deal with temporality in design to speculate about socio-technical futures. The paper unpacks how embedded definitions and assumptions of temporality in current design tools contribute to coloniality in designed futures. Based on this critique, we reject the notion that it is only AI that needs fixing, as design practice becomes implicated in how oppression extends from physical systems to global digital platforms. To make these issues visible, we dissect the Futures Cone model used in speculative design. As an alternative, the paper then presents hauntology as a vocabulary that can aid designers in accommodating pluriversal histories in anticipatory futures and reorienting their speculative tools. To illustrate the benefits of the proposed metaphors, the paper highlights examples of coloniality in digital spaces and emphasizes the failure of speculative design to decolonize future imaginaries. Using points of reference from hauntology, ones that engage with states of lingering or spectrality, and notions of nostalgia, absence, and anticipation, the paper contributes to rethinking the role that design tools play in colonizing future imaginaries, especially those pertaining to potentially disruptive technologies.