Comparative effectiveness of first‑line systemic treatments for metastatic castration‑resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta‑analysis

• Jiahuan Ai ^[1] ; Liuying Jian ^[1] ; Xiaoqin Wen ^[1] ; Xiaotong Huo ^[1] ; Xuanyi Yang ^[1] ; Jie Jiang ^[1] ; Tiantian Zhang ^[1]
  1. [1] College of Pharmacy/Southern Institute of Pharmacoeconomics and Health Technology Assessment, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
• Localización: Clinical & translational oncology, ISSN 1699-048X, Vol. 26, Nº. 10, 2024, págs. 2559-2571
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen
  • español

    College of Pharmacy/Southern Institute of Pharmacoeconomics and Health Technology Assessment, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China

  • English

    Objectives No head-to-head trials had been performed to estimate the relative effectiveness of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) and androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSi) in the first-line treatment for metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of various systemic treatment agents for patients with mCRPC.

    Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted for abstracts and full-text articles from the database’s inception through April 27, 2023. The study concentrated on assessing radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) for both overall and homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm) population, with overall survival (OS) as the secondary measure. Under the Bayesian framework, the overall effect was pooled using the fixed-effects model in base case analysis. Scenario analysis using restricted mean survival time (RMST) methods was performed to test the robustness of the results.

    Results Nine studies with 6,830 patients and 8 unique treatment options were included. Network meta-analysis demonstrated that talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide (TALA + ENZA; overall population, hazard ratio [HR], 0.20; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.16–0.26; RMST, 3.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.46–4.60; HRRm population, HR, 0.15; 95% CrI: 0.09–0.23; RMST, 4.14; 95% CI 2.84–5.39) was superior to other treatments in the first-line setting in terms of rPFS. The results of Bayesian framework and RMST models showed consistent efficacy ranks. When extrapolated to overall survival benefit, within the Bayesian framework, olaparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (OLAP + AAP) achieved the highest OS benefit for the overall population, which was not statistically significant when compared to TALA + ENZA. However, TALA + ENZA achieved the highest OS benefit at 3 years by applying RMST.

    Conclusions We suggest that talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide is probably a preferred treatment agent for the overall population and HRRm patients with mCRPC. Given the limitations of network framework and the modeling assumptions undertaken to finalize the analyses, results should be cautiously interpreted.