Exploring John Searle’s analysis of intentional satisfaction: Sociological implications for the concept of intentionality

• Mei Lan ^[1] ; Yumin Shi ^[1] ; You Zhang ^[2]
  1. [1] University of Science and Technology of China

     University of Science and Technology of China

     China

     
  2. [2] Chengdu University

     Chengdu University

     China

     
• Localización: Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, ISSN-e 1584-5397, Vol. 86, 2024, págs. 111-126
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (html)
• Resumen

  • This paper delves into the concept of intentionality, which is deeply ingrained in the representation of consciousness, and its significance in comprehending human behavior and societal dynamics. Specifically, it examines John Searle’s analysis of intentional satisfaction and contrasts it with the theory of Intentionality put forth by Husserl. Searle’s perspective, particularly his exploration of conditions of satisfaction and intentional consciousness, sheds light on the intersection of the mind and reality. At the heart of Searle’s framework lies the crucial connection between intentional satisfaction and causal experience, advocating for a naturalistic philosophical standpoint. By delving into these intricacies, the paper aims to uncover sociological implications for comprehending intentionality within the framework of social structures and interactions. Searle’s examination of intentional satisfaction offers insights into how individuals attribute meaning to their actions and experiences, shaping their understanding of the world around them. Furthermore, by juxtaposing Searle’s ideas with Husserl’s theory, the paper highlights the diverse philosophical perspectives on intentionality and underscores the complexity of this concept. Moreover, by exploring the relationship between intentional satisfaction and causal experience, Searle’s framework suggests a nuanced understanding of the mechanisms underlying human behavior. This understanding not only enriches philosophical discourse but also has profound implications for fields such as psychology and sociology. In conclusion, this paper contributes to the ongoing discourse on intentionality by offering a comparative analysis of Searle’s perspective with that of Husserl, while also emphasizing the sociological implications of understanding intentionality within social contexts. Through this exploration, we gain deeper insights into the intricate dynamics of consciousness representation and its role in shaping human behavior and societal interactions.