Which method is successful in closure of acute oroantral communication? A retrospective study

Yusuf Nuri Kaba; Ahmet E Demirbas; Cihan Topan; Canay Yılmaz Asan; Beyza Kahraman

Ayuda

Which method is successful in closure of acute oroantral communication? A retrospective study

Yusuf Nuri Kaba ^[1] ; Ahmet Emin Demirbas ^[1] ; Cihan Topan ^[1] ; Canay Yılmaz Asan ^[1] ; Beyza Kahraman ^[1]
1. [1] Erciyes University
  
  Erciyes University
  
  Turquía
Localización: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, ISSN-e 1698-6946, Vol. 29, Nº. 1 (January), 2024
Idioma: inglés
Enlaces
- Texto completo
Resumen
- This study's purpose is to retrospectively evaluate the success of surgical methods used in treating Oroantral Communication (OAC).
  
  This study was designed as a retrospective cohort study on patients who developed OAC after surgery maxillary posterior region. The records of patients previously treated with OAC were scanned through the hospital registry software. A data set was created by recording patients' age, gender, systemic disease, etiological reasons, and surgical methods. The primary predictor variable was the surgical method used to treat OAC. Other variables were age, gender, systemic disease and etiological reasons. The primary outcome was oroantral fistula development after the first surgical intervention. The patients who were positive in clinical examination and Valsalva test on control days were considered unsuccessful. One-way analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for quantitative variables in more than two groups. Pearson chi-square test was used to compare categorical data.
  
  This retrospective cohort study was completed with 605 patients who met the study criteria among 95,883 patients who underwent surgery in the maxillary posterior region. The incidence of OAC was 0.63%. The patients consisted of 238 female and 367 male patients. The mean age was 41.06±14.48 years. Buccal flap and Buccal Fat Pad methods were used most frequently in the treatment. While treatment was completed with the first surgical intervention in 592 (97.85%) patients, OAF developed in 13 (2.15%) patients. No statistically significant relation existed between surgical technique and OAF development (p>0.005). The success rate of the Buccal Flap method was 98.7%, and the Buccal Fat Pad method was 95.8%.
  
  The results of this study showed that noninvasive methods in openings smaller than 5 mm and surgical treatment methods in openings larger than 5 mm have a high success rate with the limitations of present study.