Professional skepticism for green reputation clients: A mixed method study of technology enabled audits

• Ashish Varma ^[2] ; Daniela Mancini ^[1] ; Shreya Kaushik ^[2]
  1. [1] University of Teramo

     University of Teramo

     Teramo, Italia

     
  2. [2] IMT Ghaziabad, India
• Localización: The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, ISSN 1577-8517, Vol. 23, Nº. 29, 2023, págs. 137-179
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • The research investigated auditor’s Professional Skepticism (PS) mindset while auditing the “integrated financial statement” of green reputation clients in a technology enabled audit environment. The study tries to understand the difference in thought and action of auditors based on perception of their client as sustainability responsible or not. Subsequently, the study offers meaningful insights about the nuances that upholds this distinction. This research comprises two studies using the mixed method procedure as per Creswell and Clark (2017). The first study is a 2 x 2 between subject experiment. The second study uses the Theories in Use (TiU) methodology by analyzing qualitative interviews of practicing auditors in an emerging market setting. The findings of study 1 (comprising the experiment) highlight that auditors are more professionally skeptical while auditing clients with a green reputation. Study 2 (utilizing qualitative interviews) points out that technology assists the PS mindset by enhancing the audit effectiveness and audit efficiency of green client’s audit. The study offers an in-depth understanding of the level of auditor’s PS mindset toward clients with a green reputation, and therefore demystifies the inherent forces at play during such a phenomenon. Although the setting of the study is an emerging market, the study offers transferable findings to improve the overall understanding of auditor’s mindset. The study has implications for multiple actors engaged in the audit process, viz., auditors, audit firms, regulator of the audit profession, audit committees, academia, and policy makers.