Scott J. Peters, Tamra Stambaugh, Matthew C. Makel, Lindsay Ellis Lee, Matthew T. McBee, D. Betsy McCoach, Kiana R. Johnson
Debates over identification procedures for gifted and talented students dominate the field and serve as the topic of many of its internal and external debates. We believe this is due to a lack of commonly accepted criteria for how to evaluate identification procedures. In this article, we present the Cost, Alignment, Sensitivity, and Access (CASA) criteria, a framework to evaluate identification systems according to their cost, alignment to services, sensitivity, and access. We believe these criteria would facilitate more productive conversations over identification and continued growth and improvement for the field as a whole.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados