H. Z. Okulu, Ayse Oguz-Unver, B Senler, O Bektas, S Arabacioglu, N Muslu, Y. Ozdem Yilmaz
This study examines the inter-raterreliability of the SISCOP, a protocol forobserving scientific inquiry in classrooms. Thedata was collected through a four-levelprofessional development program that includedonline mentoring. The analysis involvescalculating inter-rater reliability between mentorscores, self-assessment, and mentor scores, aswell as peer assessment and mentor scores,using the SISCOP to evaluate course videos.The findings reveal high inter-rater reliabilityamong mentors, indicating consistentobservations. The agreement between selfassessment/peer assessment and mentorscores is comparatively lower. However, asimplementation levels advance, the inter-raterreliability coefficients increase, suggestingenhanced proficiency in evaluating scientificinquiry.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados