Examining linguistic and experimenter biases through “non-native” versus “native” speech

• Autores: Rachel Elizabeth Weissler, Shiloh Drake, Ksenia Kampf, Carissa Diantoro, Kurtis Foster, Audrey Kirkpatrick, Isabel Preligera, Orion Wesson, Anna Wood, Melissa M. Baese-Berk
• Localización: Applied psycholinguistics, ISSN 0142-7164, Vol. 44, Nº 4, 2023 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Towards a Just and Equitable Applied Psycholinguistics), págs. 460-474
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • There is a consensus in psycholinguistic research that listening to unfamiliar speech constitutes a challenging listening situation. In this commentary, we explore the problems with the construct of non-native and ask whether using this construct in research is useful, specifically to shift the communicative burden from the language learner to the perceiver, who often occupies a position of power. We examine what factors affect perception of non-native talkers. We frame this question by addressing the observation that not all “difficult” listening conditions provide equal challenges. Given this, we ask how cognitive and social factors impact perception of unfamiliar accents and ask what our psycholinguistic measurements are capturing. We close by making recommendations for future work. We propose that the issue is less with the terminology of native versus non-native, but rather how our unexamined biases affect the methodological assumptions that we make. We propose that we can use the existing dichotomy to create research programs that focus on teaching perceivers to better understand talkers more generally. Finally, we call on perceivers and researchers alike to question the idea of speech being “native,” “non-native,” “unfamiliar,” and “accented” to better align with reality as opposed to our inherently biased views.