Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention

    1. [1] Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

      Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

      Brasil

    2. [2] PhD Student of the Post-Graduate Program in Oral Rehabilitation, Universidade Estadual de São Paulo – UNESP, Araraquara, Brazil
    3. [3] Professor of the Dentistry Post-Graduate Program, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil; Professor of the Department of Physics, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
  • Localización: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, ISSN-e 1989-5488, Vol. 15, Nº. 8 (August), 2023, págs. 649-657
  • Idioma: inglés
  • Enlaces
  • Resumen
    • Failures in glass fiber post (GFP) retention may be associated with low adhesion achieved in root dentin.

      55 single-rooted premolars were endodontically treated and distributed according to different adhesion strategies (n=11): G1: RelyX ARC (3M ESPE; etch-rinse strategy); G2: Relyx Ultimate (3M ESPE; etch-rinse strategy); G3: AllCem (FGM; etch-rinse strategy); G4: Relyx Ultimate (3M ESPE; self-etching strategy); G5: RelyX U200 (3M ESPE; self-adhesive strategy). For Bonding Strength (BS) analysis, the roots were sectioned in slices (1.0mm thickness) corresponding to each root third and submitted to push-out test. The type of failure was assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

      The highest BS averages were found in G2 and G3. However, in the middle and apical root thirds, G3 showed statistically similar results to G4 and G5. In the cervical and middle third, G1 was statistically similar to G4 and G5. The mixed type of failure was the most common in all groups.

      Self-etching (G4) and self-adhesive resin (G5) cements, showed similar BS results of immediate bonding in the cementation of GFP compared to conventional resin cements (G1, G2, G3).


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno