Resumen de Comparison of Eradication Concepts Corruption Criminal Acts in Indonesia and Japan
Purpose:Abuse of authority is one of the constituents of article 3 of the Regulation for the Abolition of Depravity Offences; It is a rule of administrative law that includes criminal penalties, so there are many interpretations and criminal penalties for abuse of authority are lighter, since the crimes committed do not necessarily have purpose or intention and lack jurisdiction. Cases of corruption generally begin with the abuse of authority by those in power.
Method:The penalty imposed in the Law to punish criminal acts of corruption does not yet have a sense of justice for the accused, so the Law does not function according to the objectives, benefits and ideals of the Indonesian Law.
Results:This font of study is regulating. Descriptive and prescribed environment of this research. The method of vision is made from the statutory point of view, since in addition to describing and explaining the same policy of the public officials who were convicted, these are analyzed, through a process, through the Law of Government Administration and the provisions of the Law for the Extermination of Crimes of Exploitation.
Conclusions:The eradication of corrupt crime is a crime that is considered extraordinary. However, in modern Japan, corruption cases are lower than in Indonesia. Therefore, the comparison of the concept of eradication of dishonesty in Indonesia and Japan must be discussed.
