Venezuela
Se analizó la estructura de la comunidad de peces de la Laguna de Raya durante 1990. Las capturas se efectuaron mensualmente en la boca y el interior de la laguna, utilizando un chinchorro playero de 3 1 m de longitud, 2.15 m de altura y 6 mm de abertura de malla. Se capturaron 19,516 especímenes, correspondientes a 30 familias, 50 géneros y 62 especies. Las más numerosas fueron Anchoa hepsetus, con 36.60%, y Eucinostomus gula, con 23.51%. La diversidad numérica fluctuó entre 1.74 y 3.51 bits/ind, la diversidad en peso, entre 1.91 y 3.5 bits/ind: la riqueza de especies, entre 3.45 y 4.29; la equitatividad, entre 0.48 y 0.74; la redundancia, entre 0.28 y 0.67; la dominancia, entre 42.25 y 80.61%. Las especies dominantes fueron: Eucinostomus gula, Diapterus rhombeus, Anchoa hepsetus, Archosargus rhomboidalis, Atius herzbergii y Xenomelaniris brasiliensis. Se encontró 41.94% de visitantes ocasionales, 30.65% de visitantes cíclicos y 27.42% de residentes permanentes. Igualmente, se encontró 40.32% de especies consumidoras de primer orden, 40.32% de segundo orden y 19.36% de tercer orden. El bajo porcentaje de residentes permanentes indica la inestabilidad de esta área.
The structure of the fish community of Raya Lagoon was analysed during 1990. Monthly catches were made in the mouth and inner part of the lagoon, using a 6 mm-mesh beach seine net, 31 m in length and 2.15 m in height. A total of 19,516 specimens, corresponding to 30 families, 50 genera and 62 species, were caught. The most numerous were Anchoa hepsetus, 36.60%, and Eucinostomus gula, 23.51%. Numerical diversity fluctuated between 1.74 and 3.51 bits/ind diversity in terms of weight, between 1.91 and 3.5 bits/ind, species richness, between 3.45 and 4.29; equitability, between 0.48 and 0.74; redundancy, between 0.28 and 0.67; dominance, between 42.25 and 80.61%. The dominant species were Eucinostomus gula, Diapterus rhombeus, Anchoa hepsetus, Archosargus rhomboidalis, Arius herzbergii and Xenomelaniris brasiliensis. Of the species found, 41.94% were occasional visitors, 30.65% were cyclical visitors and 27.42% were permanent residents. Likewise, 40.32% were first order consumer species; 40.32%, second order consumers; 19.36%, third order consumers. The low percentage of permanent residents indicates this area’s instability.
© 2001-2026 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados