Public Records Aren't Public: Systemic Barriers to Measuring Court Functioning & Equity

• Albrecht, Kat ^[1] ; Filip, Kaitlyn ^[2]
  1. [1] Georgia State University

     Georgia State University

     Estados Unidos

     
  2. [2] Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
• Localización: The journal of criminal law and criminology, ISSN 0091-4169, Vol. 113, Nº. 1, 2023, págs. 1-34
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • The nascent field of computational law has grown dramatically in recent decades, with an interdisciplinary universe of scholars tackling a variety of theoretical and empirical projects that consider both law-as-code and law-asdata. Law professors Frankenreiter and Livermore name and distinguish these two trends in computational legal analysis as the project of modeling law as a set of rules (law-as-code) versus the project of extracting information from legal text to apply to other research problems (law-as-data).1 Here, we focus more specifically on applications of law-as-data, but more generally argue that there is a system-level problem constraining both types of legal analysis that has yet to be dealt with.