Analysis of the precise relation between common views on concepts and artifacts is largely missing. In this paper, I address one central case of philosophical scrutiny: the relation between anti-individualism about concept possession and the epistemic privilege of authors as regards the artifacts they create. I show that these theses are in a formidable tension and that philosophers would be well advised to choose one between the two. I argue, finally, that this choice leaves untouched the essentially intentional, mind-dependent nature of artifactuality.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados