Legal judgment and cultural motivation: enthymematic form in Marbury v. Madison

• Per Fjelstad ^[1]
  1. [1] Penn State University
• Localización: Southern communication journal, ISSN 1041-794X, Vol. 60, nº 1, 1994, págs. 22-32
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Historians and critics have long assessed the political import of Marbury v. Madison, an 1803 Supreme Court decision that declared part of a Congressional act unconstitutional. Critics explain the decision as part of an evolution in constitutional law and as a lively political drama. This essay identifies inferences by which the written opinion poses judgments about the function of law. The opinion delimits law to decisions about personal rights; it radicalizes its field of concern by reversing its argumentative momentum; it develops a progression of dichotomies that ask readers to stand in for the viability of a contractual political order. These ways of constructing the issue ask readers to affirm a formative myth of national identity.