Hungría
This article argues against the idea that there is a continuity in the way in which Kant and Hegel conceive the normativity of conceptuality – normally seen as the authentic nucleus of both their philosophies, as opposed to pre-Kantian metaphysics.
It therefore contests the practice of interpreting Hegel’s relation to Kant in an epistemological sense. Despite being present in Hegel’s account, the epistemologically normative role of conceptuality is just a corollary to its ontological understanding.
Finally, it affirms that, in this respect, Hegel’s position is to be seen more as a radicalization of Wolff ’s stance than as an alternative to it.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados