Sangolqui, Ecuador
En este artículo, se evalúa el desempeño sísmico estructural mediante análisis no lineal acorde a la metodología del ASCE/SEI 41-17 y se determina la probabilidad de colapso de las estructuras sometidas a 11 movimientos del terreno, escalados a niveles de amenaza correspondientes a sismos de servicio, de diseño y máximo considerado. Se realiza modelos de elementos finitos de estructuras tridimensionales de 1, 2 y 3 pisos de pórticos de hormigón armado con una estructuración típica de la construcción artesanal y con un diseño sismo resistente, se considera en la respuesta el pórtico sin y con la influencia de la manipostería de relleno típica de Ecuador. La influencia de la manipostería de relleno cambia el comportamiento estructural generando desempeños estructurales no aceptables y altas probabilidad de colapso para el sismo de diseño. Los daños observados durante terremotos anteriores son consistentes con los resultados de este estudio.
In this paper, the structural seismic performance is evaluated by nonlinear analysis according to the ASCE/SEI 41-17 methodology, and the probability of collapse of structures subjected to 11 ground movements, scaled to hazard levels corresponding to serviceability, design, and maximum considered earthquakes, is determined. Three-dimensional Finite Element Models (FEM) of one, two, and three-story frame structures are evaluated subject to eleven different ground motions, selected and scaled to represent these hazard levels. Following the methodology mentioned earlier, collapse probabilities are estimated for RC frames typical of Ecuador. Structures in this study are divided into two categories: Those designed according to seismic-resistant engineering practice and those built without engineering design. For each category, infilled and non-infilled frames are distinguished. Infill masonry negatively impacts structural performance and the collapse probability of frame structures. Damages observed during previous earthquakes are consistent with the results of this study.
© 2001-2026 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados