Despite extensive examination of Kant’s Transcendental Idealist account of (purported) freedom of action, an important question has been neglected about why and how Kant can use two distinct models of human action when considering any particular human act. The present paper examines and answers this question, revealing neglected yet important points about Kant’s account of action and its understanding and assessment.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados