Kreisfreie Stadt Köln, Alemania
The construction of μὴ ἵνα + subjunctive, which is attested in Greek documen-tary papyri of the Roman and Byzantine periods, is conventionally explained as an inversion of ἵνα μή + subjunctive. By reference to various examples, it is argued here that the two patterns (i. e. ἵνα μή and μὴ ἵνα) are not in fact syn-tactically equivalent variants, but rather convey different meanings and func-tions on both the syntactic and the pragmatic level. In reality, μὴ ἵνα with the subjunctive does not constitute a subordinate clause but rather represents an instance of grammatical ‘insubordination’. The investigation combines a mor-phosyntactic analysis with a pragmatic and cognitive approach.
© 2001-2026 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados