This paper explores some recent proposals that apply second-person ideas to model some of our epistemic interactions. After criticizing those views that rely on the specific constitution of second-person reasons, either as reasons to trust or as reasons to accept or revise beliefs derived from mutual demands and relations of recognition, it is argued that it makes sense to incorporate some of the intuitions of the second-person model to characterise our testimonial and deliberative practices if one attends to how one learns to be an epistemic agent in contexts in which we share knowledge.
© 2001-2025 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados