In vitro evaluation of the retentive effectiveness of axial attachments used in implant-retained overdentures after 1 year of function

• Autores: David Chávarri Prado, Aritza Brizuela Velasco, Markel Diéguez Pereira, Yelko Chento Valiente, Alejandro Estrada-Martínez, Esteban Pérez Pevida, Ángel Álvarez Arenal
• Localización: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, ISSN-e 0882-2786, Vol. 37, Nº. 3, 2022, págs. 556-562
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Purpose: The aim of this study was to measure and compare the retention degrees of different attachment systems before and after 1 year of mastication and removal/insertion simulations. Materials and Methods: A 4 × 10–mm implant embedded in self-curing acrylic resin was placed inside a rectangular metal frame installed in a plastic container with artificial saliva at 37ºC. Three different attachment systems were connected to the implants: Dalbo Classic, Locator (with blue, pink, and clear inserts), and Klockner Rotula. A loading test at 100 N and 1.25 Hz frequency was repeated 10 times for each attachment (changing the matrix component or plastic insert) until a total of 300,000 cycles and 1,095 removal/ insertion sequences. The retention force was assessed at baseline until the end of the test (1 year) after 3-month intervals of simulation. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey test (P < .05) were performed for statistical analyses. Results: Klockner Rotula showed the highest retention values at the beginning (69.6 ± 9.2 N; 7.1 ± 0.9 kg) and the end of the test (51.4 ± 5.4 N; 5.2 ± 0.6 kg), while Dalbo Classic showed the lowest values both at the beginning (13.1 ± 1.7 N; 1.3 ± 0.2 kg) and the end of the test (6.7 ± 1.6 N; 0.7 ± 0.2 kg). Locator with clear insert exhibited the lowest retention loss ratio (20.4%), while Locator with blue insert showed the highest (50.8%). At the end of the test, all attachment systems showed a significant decrease in retention force in comparison with the initial retention (P < .001). Conclusion: Locator attachments with clear and pink inserts and the Klockner Rotula attachment system showed retention forces > 20 N (2 kg) after 1 year of mastication and prosthesis insertion/removal simulation. All attachment systems showed a progressive loss of retention, which was higher for Locator attachments with blue and pink inserts and Dalbo Classic. The Klockner Rotula attachment system showed the highest retention values both at the beginning and the end of the test.