Evaluation of Bone Density in Sinus Elevation by Using Allograft and Xenograft: A CBCT Study

• Autores: Reza Tabrizi, Hassan Mirmohammad Sadeghi, Maryam Mohammadi, Mehrdad Dehghanpour Barouj, Mahtab Kheyrkhahi
• Localización: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, ISSN-e 0882-2786, Vol. 37, Nº. 1, 2022, págs. 114-119
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Purpose: The stability and density of the grafted bone in the maxillary sinus are essential for dental implant survival. This study aimed to compare bone density following mineralized allogeneic bone and deproteinized bovine bone and evaluate the volumetric changes as the secondary outcome.

    Materials and methods: In this prospective cohort study, subjects were randomly allocated into two groups of mineralized bone and deproteinized bone to augment the maxillary sinus. Subjects underwent CBCT immediately after augmentation and 9 months later. The relative bone density was the primary outcome, and the volumetric change after 9 months was the secondary outcome of the study. The authors used an independent t test for assessing the bone density and volumetric change between the two groups.

    Results: Fifty patients were studied (n = 25 in each group). At 9 months after sinus elevation, the mean bone density was 237.20 ± 55.72 Hounsfield units (HU) in group 1 (mineralized bone) and 634.8 ± 166.11 HU in group 2 (deproteinized bone). There was a substantial difference statistically for the mean of HU between groups 1 and 2 (P < .001). The mean volume change was 0.25 ± 0.13 cm3 in group 1 (mineralized bone) and 0.06 ± 0.05 cm3 in group 2 (deproteinized bone). Assessment of the data showed a substantial difference in the mean volume change at 9 months after sinus elevation between groups 1 and 2 (P < .001).

    Conclusion: Considering the results of this study, the deproteinized bone was associated with higher relative bone density than the mineralized bone 9 months after sinus elevation. The volume change of the deproteinized bone was less than the mineralized bone in the study time.