Linguistic meanings meet linguistic form

• Krempel, Raquel ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidade de São Paulo

     Universidade de São Paulo

     Brasil

     
• Localización: Manuscrito: revista internacional de filosofía, ISSN 0100-6045, Vol. 45, Nº. 1, 2022 (Ejemplar dedicado a: jan./mar.), págs. 28-42
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • In this paper I critically address some ideas presented in Patrick Duffley’s book Linguistic Meaning Meets Linguistic Form. Duffley adopts the semiological principle that linguistic signs have stable meanings. I argue that this principle leads Duffley to an artificial description of the meaning of the preposition for, in attempting to avoid the charge of polysemy. Another issue is that the principle is not consistently followed throughout the book, such as in Duffley’s analysis of the meaning of start, or in his acceptance of words with encyclopedic meanings. I also point out that the proposed meaning of start and the view that the meaning of some words is encyclopedic have problems of their own.