Iratxe Duñabeitia Usategui, Haritz Arrieta Etxeberria, Ana Rodríguez Larrad, Francisco Javier Gil Goicouria, Izaro Esain, Susana María Gil Orozko, Jon Irazusta Astiazaran, Iraia Bidaurrazaga López de Letona
This study compares the effects of 2 common recovery interventions performed shortly after an exhausting interval running session on running economy (RE) and biomechanics. Forty-eight well-trained male runners performed an exhaustive interval running protocol and an incremental treadmill test 24 hours later at 3 speeds: 12, 14, and 16 km[middle dot]h-1. Subjects randomly received either massage, cold water immersion (CWI), or passive rest (control). Runners repeated the treadmill test 48 hours after the first test. A two-way mixed analysis of variance was performed comparing groups and testing times. The massage group had significantly better recovery than the control group at 14 km[middle dot]h-1 in RE (p < 0.05; [eta]2 = 0.176) and greater stride height and angle changes at 16 km[middle dot]h-1 (p < 0.05; [eta]2 = 0.166 and p < 0.05; [eta]2 = 0.208, respectively). No differences were observed between the CWI and control groups. The massage group had greater stride height and angle changes at 16 km[middle dot]h-1 than the CWI group (p < 0.05; [eta]2 = 0.139 and p < 0.05; [eta]2 = 0.168, respectively). Moreover, differences in magnitude suggested moderate effects on RE ([eta]2 = 0.076) and swing time ([eta]2 = 0.110). These results suggest that massage intervention promotes faster recovery of RE and running biomechanics than CWI or passive rest.
© 2001-2025 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados