Influence of Muscle Architecture on Maximal Rebounding in Young Boys

• John M. Radnor ^[1] ; Jon L. Oliver ^[3] ; Charlie M. Waugh ^[2] ; Gregory D. Myer ^[4] ; Rhodri S. Lloyd ^[5]
  1. [1] Cardiff Metropolitan University

     Cardiff Metropolitan University

     Castle, Reino Unido

     
  2. [2] University of British Columbia

     University of British Columbia

     Canadá

     
  3. [3] Sport Performance Research Institute New Zealand, AUT University, Aukland, New Zealand
  4. [4] Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
  5. [5] Center for Sport Science and Human Performance, Waikato Institute of Technology, Hamilton, New Zealand

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Journal of strength and conditioning research: the research journal of the NSCA, ISSN 1064-8011, Vol. 35, Nº. 12, 2021, págs. 3378-3385
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • The aims of the current study were to (a) investigate differences in maximal rebound jump kinetics in boys at different stages of maturity and (b) determine the relationship of muscle architecture characteristics to maximal rebound jump kinetics. One hundred twenty-seven male, secondary school children were categorized into maturity groups (pre-, circa-, and post-peak height velocity) based on their maturity offset value. Muscle architecture of the gastrocnemius medialis (GM) and vastus lateralis (VL) was evaluated at rest using B-mode ultrasonography. Subjects then performed maximal rebound jumps quantified on a force platform. There were moderate to large differences across all maturity groups for peak ground reaction force, impulse measures, and average power variables (d = 0.73-2.67; p < 0.05). Gastrocnemius medialis and VL muscle thickness explained between 38.5 and 55.8% of the variance in peak force, impulse, and power variables; however, muscle architecture was less important determinant of contact time, jump height, reactive strength index, rate of force development, eccentric velocity, concentric velocity, and allometrically scaled measures (3.3-17.2%). The current results indicate that most kinetics used during maximal vertical rebounding are greater in more mature boys. Furthermore, maturational increases in GM muscle architecture seem important for maximal vertical jumping and are specifically associated with increased force, power, and impulse measures. Practically, these findings may underline benefits in targeting resistance training activities that are focused to increase lower limb muscle mass to positively influence maximal rebounding kinetics in young boys.