Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


An international study on psychological coping during Covid-19: towards a meaning-centered coping style

  • Nikolett Eisenbeck [1] ; David F. Carreno [2] ; Paul T.P. Wong [21] ; Joshua A. Hicks [3] ; María Ruíz-Ruano García [4] ; Jorge L. Puga [4] ; James Greville [5] ; Ines Testoni [22] ; Gianmarco Biancalani [22] ; Ana Carla Cepeda López [6] ; Sofía Villareal [6] ; Violeta Enea [23] ; Christian Schulz-Quach [7] ; Jonas Jansen [24] ; Maria-Jose Sanchez-Ruiz [8] ; Murat Yıldırım [25] ; Gökmen Arslan [9] ; José Fernando A. Cruz [10] ; Rui Manuel Sofia [11] ; Maria José Ferreira [26] ; Farzana Ashraf [27] ; Grażyna Wąsowicz [12] ; Shahinaz M. Shalaby [13] ; Reham A. Amer [13] ; Hadda Yousfi [14] ; John Bosco Chika Chukwuorji [28] ; Valeschka M. Guerra [15] ; Sandeep Singh [16] ; Samantha Heintzelman [29] ; Bonar Hutapea [30] ; Bouchara Béjaoui [31] ; Arobindu Dash [32] ; Karoly Kornel Schlosser [17] ; Malin K. Anniko [18] ; Martin Rossa [33] ; Hattaphan Wongcharee [34] ; Andreja Avsec [19] ; Gaja Zager Kocjan [19] ; Tina Kavčič [19] ; Dmitry A. Leontiev [20] ; Olga Taranenko [20] ; Elena Rasskazova [20] ; Elizabeth Maher [35] ; José Manuel García-Montes [2]
    1. [1] Universidad de Sevilla

      Universidad de Sevilla

      Sevilla, España

    2. [2] Universidad de Almería

      Universidad de Almería

      Almería, España

    3. [3] Texas A&M University

      Texas A&M University

      Estados Unidos

    4. [4] Universidad de Granada

      Universidad de Granada

      Granada, España

    5. [5] University of South Wales

      University of South Wales

      Pontypridd, Reino Unido

    6. [6] Universidad de Monterrey

      Universidad de Monterrey

      México

    7. [7] University of Toronto

      University of Toronto

      Canadá

    8. [8] Lebanese American University

      Lebanese American University

      Líbano

    9. [9] Mehmet Akif Ersoy University

      Mehmet Akif Ersoy University

      Turquía

    10. [10] Universidade do Minho

      Universidade do Minho

      Braga (São José de São Lázaro), Portugal

    11. [11] Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo

      Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo

      Viana do Castelo (Monserrate), Portugal

    12. [12] Kozminski University

      Kozminski University

      Warszawa, Polonia

    13. [13] Tanta University

      Tanta University

      Egipto

    14. [14] University of Batna

      University of Batna

      Argelia

    15. [15] Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

      Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

      Brasil

    16. [16] Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology

      Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology

      India

    17. [17] University of London

      University of London

      Reino Unido

    18. [18] Örebro University

      Örebro University

      Suecia

    19. [19] University of Ljubljana

      University of Ljubljana

      Eslovenia

    20. [20] Higher School of Economics, National Research University

      Higher School of Economics, National Research University

      Rusia

    21. [21] Meaning-Centered Counselling Institute Inc., Canada
    22. [22] University of Padova, Italy
    23. [23] Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Romania
    24. [24] Rheinland Klinikum Neuss GmbH, Germany
    25. [25] Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, Turkey
    26. [26] Lusófona University of Oporto, Portugal
    27. [27] COMSATS University, Lahore, Pakistan
    28. [28] University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nigeria
    29. [29] Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, US
    30. [30] Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
    31. [31] Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, France
    32. [32] IUBAT—International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, Bangladesh
    33. [33] Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
    34. [34] Pathumwan Institute of Technology, Thailand
    35. [35] New Zealand Acceptance & Commitment Therapy Training Ltd., New Zealand
  • Localización: International journal of clinical and health psychology, ISSN 1697-2600, Vol. 22, Nº. 1, 2022, págs. 11-20
  • Idioma: inglés
  • Títulos paralelos:
    • Estudio internacional sobre afrontamiento psicológico durante el COVID-19: hacia un afrontamiento centrado en el sentido
  • Enlaces
  • Resumen
    • español

      Antecedentes/Objetivo Este estudio examinó el papel de diferentes estrategias de afrontamiento psicológico en la salud mental y física durante las fases iniciales de la crisis de COVID-19.

      Método 11,227 personas de 30 países representando todos los continentes participaron en el estudio y completaron medidas de malestar psicológico (depresión, estrés y ansiedad), soledad, bienestar, salud física, medidas de afrontamiento centrado en el problema y en la emoción, y una medida denominada Escala del Afrontamiento Centrado en el Sentido (MCCS) que fue desarrollada en este estudio. El análisis de validación de la MCCS se realizó en todos los países, y los datos se evaluaron mediante un modelo multinivel.

      Resultados La MCCS mostró una estructura unifactorial en 30 países con buenos resultados de validez test-retest, concurrente y divergente. Los análisis mostraron resultados mixtos en cuanto a las estrategias de afrontamiento centradas en la emoción y en el problema. La MCCS fue el predictor positivo más fuerte de salud física y mental, independientemente de las características demográficas y las variables a nivel de país.

      Conclusiones Los resultados sugieren que la MCCS es un insrumento fiable para medir afrontamiento centrado en el sentido. Estos resultados pueden servir para dirigir políticas que promuevan un afrontamiento eficaz con el fin de mitigar el sufrimiento colectivo durante la pandemia

    • English

      Background/Objective This study examined the role of different psychological coping mechanisms in mental and physical health during the initial phases of the COVID-19 crisis with an emphasis on meaning-centered coping.

      Method A total of 11,227 people from 30 countries across all continents participated in the study and completed measures of psychological distress (depression, stress, and anxiety), loneliness, well-being, and physical health, together with measures of problem-focused and emotion-focused coping, and a measure called the Meaning-centered Coping Scale (MCCS) that was developed in the present study. Validation analyses of the MCCS were performed in all countries, and data were assessed by multilevel modeling (MLM).

      Results The MCCS showed a robust one-factor structure in 30 countries with good test-retest, concurrent and divergent validity results. MLM analyses showed mixed results regarding emotion and problem-focused coping strategies. However, the MCCS was the strongest positive predictor of physical and mental health among all coping strategies, independently of demographic characteristics and country-level variables.

      Conclusions The findings suggest that the MCCS is a valid measure to assess meaning-centered coping. The results also call for policies promoting effective coping to mitigate collective suffering during the pandemic.


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno