Our aim in this paper is to critically assess Peter van Inwagen’s consequence argument for the incompatibility of free will and determinism. This argument is sound only if rule (β) is valid. We present reasons to reject or to be skeptical of the rule (β) and similar rules. So, the consequence argument is not a sound argument for the incompatibility of free will and determinism.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados