Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


Open Access Marriage quandaries in Central Asia

    1. [1] University of Amsterdam

      University of Amsterdam

      Países Bajos

    2. [2] Lumière University Lyon 2

      Lumière University Lyon 2

      Arrondissement de Lyon, Francia

  • Localización: Oriente Moderno, ISSN 0030-5472, Vol. 100, Nº. 2, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Marriage quandaries in Central Asia), págs. 121-146
  • Idioma: inglés
  • Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
  • Resumen
    • Many Central Asians speak of marriage as important and self-evident despite the fact that marriage in practice across the region presents a more complicated story. There is not only an extensive array of practices indicated by the single term marriage and a wide variety of things accomplishes by its conclusion and duration, but many non-marital sets of relations in Central Asia similarly realise what marriage does. This may lead one to question whether there is any sense in trying to pin marriage down at all. Yet, this tension — the flexibility of marriage in form and function, and its overlap with nonmarriage on the one hand, and its abiding importance and, at times, self-evidentiary nature, on the other — we suggest, lies at the heart of marriage-as-practice in Central Asia. Following recent turns in kinship studies, and long-standing feminist traditions, this paper envisages marriage as a relational practice of legitimization rather than pinning it down as a particular content. We argue that by focusing on the act of getting married in particular, its particular efficacy, as well as the disputes, questions, and conflicts that sometime arise as a result – in short, the quandaries of getting married – we get not only at this tensional nature of marriage, but at the everyday concerns and major societal issues wrapped up in marriage in Central Asia.


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno